thank you. very usefull i think i'll try btrfs or jfs, i'll send you btrfs result for you.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Nux! nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab rahmani wrote:
thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario. but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it true?
——— Ashkan R On Aug 4, 2012 6:39 PM, "Nux!" nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote:
hello i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. i want to share it on network via nfs. which file system is better for it? thank you ——— Ashkan R _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No redundancy? That's a lot of data to lose. :-)
As for your question, I'd use ext4. It has caught up a lot with XFS and it's THE file system supported by RHEL and Fedora.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Well, I think ext4 is pretty fast. Maybe XFS has a slight edge over it in some scenarios. ZFS on linux is still highly experimental and has received close to no testing. If you are in mood for experiments EL6.3 includes BTRFS as technology preview for 64bit machines. Give it a try and let us know how it goes.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos