Upstream updates cluster packages about a week after OS patches. I found that out when putting in a new cluster and 4.6 came out. The cluster packages lagged behind a week deliberately for stability's sake.
Scott
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Doug Tucker tuckerd@engr.smu.edu wrote:
Tru,
I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that matter) and be lucky enough it would work?
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:48 +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote:
Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS...
I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and
viola...
You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing
machine
before rolling the updates on a production server? We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on
your
own setup.
Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct
module and
hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from
lost+found.
That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not
installed
for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability
to
mount the XFS filesystem.
I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel).
That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS...
Tru _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos