19 May
2014
19 May
'14
3:35 a.m.
On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.
How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believe that some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files.
Ted Miller Elkhart, IN