Sorry, that was meant for Dan Trainor only.
[ FYI, I have formally asked that my posts be blocked from reaching the list. That will solve any chance like this. ]
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:20 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
The problem is that I don't get "defensive" until people psycho-analyze me directly.
Take for example this latest post ...
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/012024.html
"This list is completely useless if you're going to be attacked constantly by the likes of Bryan without anyone else stepping in and putting a stop to it."
One quick trip to the CentOS archives will show that Mr. Preston entered not 1 but *2* prior threadds just to criticize me. How non-objective can he be? But when I do it, it's an "attack."
"I apologize and I admit it was wrong to continue an OT post here. But I was just trying to defend myself."
Ahhh, that age-old excuse. Not even *I* claim "I'm just defending myself." I take full ownership of what I do. But apparently I piss off almost everyone in a room according to Mr. Preston.
Unobjective hypocrisy. I'm honest and take ownership. Select others aren't honest and man they never take ownership without a "but ...".