On 25/02/2021 16:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 10:07, J Martin Rushton <martinrushton56@btinternet.com mailto:martinrushton56@btinternet.com> wrote:
On 25/02/2021 14:49, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 09:13, J Martin Rushton via CentOS > <centos@centos.org <mailto:centos@centos.org> <mailto:centos@centos.org <mailto:centos@centos.org>>> wrote: > > > > On 25/02/2021 13:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I was recently looking at Raymond's book "The Art of UNIX Programming" > from 2003. He, along with contributors Thompson (inventor of UNIX), > Kernigham (C and AWK), Korn and others of that callibre, espouse > creating "little tools" that do one job reliably and well. The > likes of > Gnome or systemd certainly would never fit into this philosophy. I > really think we have lost a lot of maintainability and ease of > management over the last 20 years as applications are stretched to do > ever more. > > > Maybe but everytime someone says "I think these are too complex" they > then turn around and say "but I really need this to do this one more > thing." Also the complexity of tools is generational. The oldschool > 1970's Unix people were screaming that the 1980's software was too > complex because various flags had been added to central commands. The > 1980's people complained that even early Linux was too complex because > it had so much more software that depended on each other. And so forth. > > In the X11 world, there were as many people saying FVWM was way too > complex when twm was all you needed and it was making software too hard > to build. BUT could you get twm to work on our new monitor which has a > different view screen feature that made the fonts look like crap. > > The counter argument I heard from a 1970's Unix era person was "Software > gets more complicated over time as we find that more problems need to be > solved. You either keep up with it, or get out of software." He was > working in software until his death a short while ago in his 80's. > > -- > J Martin Rushton MBCS > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org> <mailto:CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos> > <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> > > > > -- > Stephen J Smoogen. > The irony being that moving to UNIX I had it drummed into me that the one tool-one job ethos was a great advance upon the rigidly defined and integrated monolith of VMS. Oh, and that was in the 1990s. -- J Martin Rushton MBCS
And everyone I worked with told me that Unix was a poor reinvention of TSX-11 where you could get real work done. But since VMS came out over a decade after Unix, I can't say Unix is an advance over VMS.
In any case this is devolving into the 4 Yorkshiremen skit so I am done here.
-- Stephen J Smoogen.
Oi! Lay off Yorkshiremen. It'll only be envy that you weren't born one. :-)