19 Feb
2015
19 Feb
'15
6:33 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file:
ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1
Which should have been:
ADDRESS0=192.168.6.0
NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1
But it still doesn't matter. Your netmask in the ifcfg- file already covers that range and you don't need another route/GATEWAY for it. You don't need the route- file at all.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@gmail.com