6 Dec
2004
6 Dec
'04
12:56 p.m.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, John Newbigin wrote:
Also, does anyone know where this link came from: http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/2.0/
I think that is a poor idea. If it has a good reason for existing, then the version should be 2 or 2.1
Of course it should be 2.1 - apologies -
the idea is that all of the centos stuff is accessed through centos/ eg centos/3.3 rather than centos-3
should make it easier for 4.0 etc
I will try to remember to use that when announcing updates
Lance
--
uklinux.net -
The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.