If you want a official fix then get your self a redhat license, nothing wrong with the excellent help that one can get from this list but by supporting redhat you also in my eyes support centos.
The only thing that I have noticed with RH support is that they are actually slower to release a fix or to come up with a fix then Centos, we have quite a few centos servers where I work and this was the reason for why we lowered our licenses to redhat and migrated some servers to Centos.
Per
On 1/9/09 10:04 AM, "Vandaman" vandaman2002-sk@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Warren, Eucke wrote:
I do see the manual fix for it and will be testing that shortly. I am, however, dealing with a fairly rigid internal legal department that may not welcome a "fix" that's not "official". So I have two questions:
- Is there an "official" or "accepted"
way to inquire about the status of an open bug? 2) With regard to bug 0002329 is this something that has to be fixed upstream so it filters down to centos?
What company is this that doesn't wan't to pay for a support contract for RHEL but insists on using CentOS but requires "official fixes" only?
- Can you name and shame this comapany it will make good reading
on teh web. 2. Consider paying for RHEL so that you can actually get "official support" and can raise support tickets. 3. You probably don't understand what CentOS is or who is supposed to use it.
Regards, Vandaman.
Report another spam? Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great!
noob detector -> 15 noobs top-posting.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos