On 07/08/2014 11:05 AM, Russell Miller wrote:
On Jul 8, 2014, at 7:58 AM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
and the next one talking before try to get informations there is no monolithic daemon damned
there is one project with one source tree maintaining a lot of daemons and binaries - so be quite before you tried to learn some basics
Generally when people get personal I figure I must have hit a nerve.
I must have hit a nerve.
I didn't say it was windows-like. I said it was more windows-like than I was comfortable with. Even with multiple daemons, It's still not very transparent, somewhat incomrehensible, documented poorly while still managing to have voluminous documentation, dumps stuff everywhere, and is just generally annoying.
Even its sysv compatibility is incomplete. It runs sysv scripts, but in such a way as to break any but the simplest. I've run into situations where I've actually had to make a systemd unit because it broke the script, and I couldn't fix it. The script was fine, ran perfectly if you just ran it, and systemd did... *something*... to it. I still haven't figured out what. And debugging is an absolute pain.
I am also struggling with this and the HIPL code (on F20). If you just start the services, it takes about 5 min to complete. If you just run the programs and tell them to drop into the background it is a handful of seconds. Strip out comments from the script and it starts right up with systemctl. Huh? What is going on? I was told that systemctl does seem to try and make 'sense' out of comments...
And that's all I'm saying in response to you. Keep this up and my killfile will have one more entry.
--Russell _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos