Sure! Feel free to contact me off list. We're also looking at reengineering our DNS/DHCP infrastructure and some of the ideas might be good to discuss with you some of your ideas
----- On 28 Jun, 2017, at 09:47, Tris Hoar trishoar@bgfl.org wrote:
| On 27/06/2017 00:49, James A. Peltier wrote: |> Bind does not have a method to do multi-master replication. All updates must be |> done via an intermediary service (database). |> |> In our case, we've used containers and Consul for providing a highly available |> DNS service. A container will fire up and race for the master lock. It will |> dump the contents of the database into its named configurations and assuming it |> has the lock will assume the IP address of the master. Others just come up as |> slaves. |> |> If the master lock is not renewed after a given period of time another container |> can acquire the lock and become master by assuming the IP address of master |> (VRRP/VRID/KeepAliveD) |> | | Hi James, | | Do you have any more info on this setup? I'm in the middle of looking at | changing our DNS service and was thinking of containerising them for the | improved deployment flexibility it offers. | | Tris | | | ************************************************************* | This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential | and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity | to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email | in error please notify postmaster@bgfl.org | | The views expressed within this email are those of the | individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation | ************************************************************* | _______________________________________________ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos