On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:33:49PM +0000, Always Learning wrote:
Is systemd the beneficial, reliable, useful and workable "improved init system" or something with circa 275,000 lines of coding compared to init's circa 10,000 lines ? Things I have learned in programming include modular is better than monolithic, and less code better than M$-style bloatware which systemd appears to be.
This is a typical comment which clearly indicates very little actual knowledge of systemd. There's really not much to say other than that.
Just what is Fedora's and Red Hat's Plan B when the revolt against systemd escalates ? Whom is going to apologise for fouling-up Red Hat's EL and our beloved Centos ?
Well, that's certainly dramatic.
But the answer is simple: show us the code. If it "escalates" to the point where we have better options, that's a huge win for everyone.