--- Feizhou feizhou@graffiti.net wrote:
Dave K wrote:
On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz chrism@imntv.com
wrote:
I agree completely. I don't see any real
showstoppers that would
prevent it from being a fine desktop. There are
a few extras that I'd
want to grab from the Fedora repos, but you can't
beat the
cost/stability/speedy updates/7 year EOL with a
stick.
I agree, but I think the earlier comments have
some validity though.
It would be far more useful if certain key apps
(e.g. FireFox and
OpenOffice, I'm sure each of us has their own "key
app" list) were
kept up-to-date, perhaps in an alternative repo.
And for supporting a
large deployment, they need to be a repo,
building/installing manually
just isn't an option.
Man, you have the Centos plus repo, and if that does not make you happy, you have all the tools you need to roll your own repo. What is this about building/installing manually? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hello,
i am not sure if this is a concern, but if you are running x86_64 desktop systems then i would suggest putting the 32 bit centos. this will make life a lot more pleasant for you when installing firefox and other apps. if it is x86 then carry on :)
my .02 cents
Steven
Get your Art Supplies @ www.littleartstore.com