On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
robert mena wrote:
Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no plans to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this as personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about it.
The solution is good now and will be good whenever it appears. So there
<snip> Actually, it strikes me that I *do* have a question: what are the main problems in the build/release? Has RH deliberately obscured some part(s) of its build process, or made prerequisites utterly dependent upon specific versions of libraries - that is, more than y'all have had to deal with before?
Note that this is a question about the problemss, *not* about how y'all are going about it, nor whining that I Want It Yesterday!!! As someone who spent a lot of years as a developer (and let's not talk about the death march at a former Baby Bell), I like to know the kinds of problems that are ongoing, so I can get some feel for what's going on.
mark "sorry, no time to do some of the real work, RL is overwhelmingat the moment"
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I saw this posted yesterday on h-online.com.
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfus...