On 14.12.2020 22:39, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 12/14/20 4:09 PM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:
On 14.12.2020 21:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life
cycle [...]
And I published the link to the article because it's a fine text and
nicely argumented.
Well, it's mostly emotional (the leitmotif: "how can you say CentOS Stream is bad if you didn't try it?"). And the author's bio spoils the fun, as well:
"Ben Porter is a Linux and open source advocate, currently working as an OpenShift consultant for Red Hat."
And the comments to the graphs, where RHEL, CentOS and Fedora are placed on a line, are simply ridiculous (such as "did you use to consider RHEL to be the CentOS beta?"). With all due respect to Ben Porter, it didn't convince me.
I have posted a comment that explains why and on which topic he is wrong. You post them and I will debunk them :-)
Well, arguing with you in that Medium blog would be counter-productive: - as far as I see, we share similar viewpoints on CentOS situation - your response is very detailed, it would make little sense elaborating it