Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:04:49 -0400 m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
a) I will not use gmail. End of that suggestion.
Ok. There are numerous other providers available. I'm sure you can find them as easily as I can. You also have the rcn.com email address in your whois record.
Wait, I have *what*? How did you find that? I mean, the last time I was on rcn was, I think, '09, if not '03.
b) What assurance do I have that whoever I chose won't wind up with the same problem, given that, as I mentioned, a dozen years ago, they were blocking a good part of the city of Chicago?
What assurance do you have that your house won't burn down tonight? This is basic problem solving. You have an issue, you do your best to solve the problem,. If the fix you tried doesn't work you move on to try something else.
You have posted complaints without solving the problem. Now try a using a
I agree. Note that I also cc'd centos-owner on the original post. The problem is that nixspam's idea of how to block spam, as I argued, is 15 years out of date.
By the way, IX, the German magazine that runs nixspam, doesn't respond to emails, either. *THEY* are the problem, not my hosting provider (which, their support tells me, does work with nixspam, and pays a nice chunk of change every time they're blocked.
mark