On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:20:38AM -0700, R-Elists wrote:
the point is enforcement somehow...
Enforcement = suppression and suppression -> consequences not elimination of the issue.
why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ???
12 bucks a year? or more ?
Not likely to make a difference and just likely to reduce the worth of the list as those who know quit bothering to subscribe.
////jerry
donations cannot be taken back yet lusers can be moderated or terminated
and to come back, they donate again
- rh
But what's the point? When you give away good, free stuff, people are naturally going to ask for more. The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask for a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to write for yourself, the same does not apply to shell commands even though there is not much inherent difference in complexity. Is it just that coders are more willing to share their work than administrators even in cases where it is equally reusable?
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos