On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:25 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
James Nguyen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd slackmoehrle.lists@gmail.com wrote:
Brian, Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your reply.
OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
<snip> > if they think the solution requires a lot of CPU. Memory wise I think > machines come with at least 4Gb these days. That should do. You can > probably both boxes for around 2k? > > You already know how much F5 or any of those guys cost per device. =)
Hmmm... when the job I was at went with Radware, their price was significantly lower than F5, and I was impressed with the appliance. Nice little 1u box, not even a pizza box deep, as I recall.
mark
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Keep in mind you'd want at least 2 either it be appliances, devices or server boxes. The minimum for high availability is at least 2. That's assuming your power and internet route is already highly redundant as well. ;)