On 12/03/15 20:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is only capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which next event is deterministically predictable from previous. As with fatal things like kernel panic, it is the previous before the fatalstep is the one that you still can see...
This has nothing to do with systemd or a parallelized boot. The kernel panic is happening during the initial load of the kernel and initialization of hardware.
I know you love to blame every problem on systemd, but c’mon, this problem is going to happen with *EVERY* init system.
No, *you* don't understand what we're saying: pre-systemd, if the o/p saw that one stmt before the panic, they could look at what the system was doing *sequentially*, and so have an idea what it was failing on. With systemd's parallelism, we have no clue, other than what it's done, and no idea what's happening that's failing.
mark