9 Jan
2014
9 Jan
'14
11:37 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz rgm@htt-consult.com wrote:
I always just assumed that blowfish was good precisely because it wasn't the one that was recommended/promoted by the groups likely to be compromised. But, I try to stay out of politics so I don't worry much about keeping secrets anyway.
Bruce's twofish was better; it was his AES submission.
But didn't that come later? With nothing else to go on, that would make me think that it is more likely to have been influenced by whatever means corrupted the others.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@gmail.com