On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Bart Schaefer barton.schaefer@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rudi Ahlers rudiahlers@gmail.com wrote:
Mark,
We, in South Africa sit with a huge problem in that our clients can't connect to the rest of the world cause SEACOM is down. i.e. our client can, for the past 3 days, only surf local (i.e. local in South Africa) websites, email, etc.
So, I want to reroute all their traffic via one of our other servers
<ADSL client> - <Limited internet> - <server> - <full internet>
I'm rather rusty on the details of this, but isn't the correct way to handle this to have <server> publish an ARP route indicating that it provides routing to (the IP space containing) <ADSL client>?
Any mere proxy or VPN hosted at <server> will allow <ADSL client> to transparently establish connections, but won't allow <full internet> to reach the IP address of <ADSL client> (nor anything else in <Limited internet>). Maybe that's not needed here. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't know either.......
And I haven't been able to install openvpn on the ADSL hosted server either, so I want to try a gateway type setup