On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Camron W. Fox wrote:
[Our customer has] asked, that we change the default directory permission/ownership of /var/www/html,cgi-bin, instead of using the Documentroot and ScriptAlias parameters in the apache configuration.
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 11 2008 /var/www/cgi-bin drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 11 2008 /var/www/html
to
drwxrwxr-x 2 root user 4096 Jan 11 2008 /var/www/cgi-bin drwxrwxr-x 2 root user 4096 Jan 11 2008 /var/www/html
We have explained that it is preferable *not* to modify the default filesystem configuration of the underlying OS and have recommended that they customize the app by specifying a location of their choice in httpd.conf. They argue that they "just want to use the system default location". There is no *technical* reason for this, according to them. The location does not affect the app.
None of the other web servers we manage for them use the RHEL apache default, they all have customized locations for content and scripts.
My question is:
What argument, if any, would you use to try and convince the customer that this is a bad idea/bad practice?
Updates to the httpd package will overwrite those permissions, so there will need to be a cron job (or very vigilent SA) that monitors those perms, re-customizing them as necessary.
Otherwise, what they're asking isn't all that unusual, imo.