On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a dual license to make your code as usable and probably as ubiquitous as perl. And you have not mentioned anything about how that might hurt you.
I explained this to you in vast details. If you ignore this explanation, I cannot help you.
No, you posted some ranting misconceptions about why you don't see a need for it. But if you actually believed any of that yourself, then you would see there was no harm in adding a dual license to make it clear to everyone else. It clearly has not hurt the popularity of perl or BSD code to become GPL-compatible, nor has it forced anyone to use that code only in GPL-compatible ways.