15 Nov
2005
15 Nov
'05
10:29 p.m.
Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Has nothing to do with YUM. It has to do with RPM.
R P Herrold got mid-anal on BS:
buzz -- wrong - thanks for playing -- It has to do with the rpm packager's design decisions; nothing more, nothing less rpm did just what it was told to do.
Umm, isn't that what I said?
The RPM is built to either replace an existing config (renaming the existing as .rpmsave) or put out a copy of a new config (not touching the existing, calling the new .rpmnew).
I'm kinda confused on how I was "wrong"???
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)