On 2/22/2017 1:16 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
a) Please don't top post. b) 'T'ain't funny, McGee. They don't have the budget, and they need this server*now*... it's one of their compute nodes, and at least one person is dead in the water.
you can't afford a replacement for a 6-8 year old server (new in 2009), yet someone who is presumably being paid is not able to work. whats that costing?