On 08/27/15 13:00, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote: <>
*sigh* And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way....
. i seriously doubt it.
several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.
Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems.
. as i wrote;
several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos to respond to request that i made.
Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a company that spams.
. i will be polite and not ask what company. :-)
For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, with hundreds of photos in different settings.
. yes, i have seen them. but i believe, why should i pay for what i can see for free and live.
So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were communicating with.
. very true.
But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line.
. i agree.
one should always have choice of what pleasure one receives, or gives. tho the mystery of yet to come can make pleasures greater.
also, i do like to see the change in your attitude. a good indication of maturity.
i still believe moz gen would be a good place to continue because of the additional input.