Roberto Pereyra ha scritto:
2007/5/10, Daniel de Kok danieldk@pobox.com:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:23 +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
Also is very easy to migrate one virtual machine to a server to another for maintenance/reboots.
(Live) migration is also possible with Xen.
What I don't like of Xen is the slow restart and the disk management (either dedicated partition or image file) which can lead to slower backup and harder migration; instead I'm attracted by the standard and fully supported kernel.
Does anyone have experience on Xen and have advice on which could be
the
best compromise between the two solutions? Of course with Xen I have to start all over on learning but... hey I'm a Linux fan, I like to learn!
An additional advantage of Xen is that it works with SELinux without much hassle.
-- Daniel
Hi
Here:
http://forum.lxlabs.com/index.php?t=msg&th=374&start=0&
discuss on this subject.
Roberto
I was "underestimating" both issues (SELinux and RAM management). As of now I would take some more time to evaluate and learn Xen and do the big jump later on.
Thank you very much
Lorenzo