10 May
2007
10 May
'07
5:22 a.m.
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Hey look at me! I'm top-posting!!! Nanny-nanny-poo-poo
Come get me Trolls!
Please do not top post. :)
SATA drives typically do 60-70MBs, interleaved you should see 120-140MB/s on sequential. Random IO on SATA usually sucks too badly to even talk about...
Eh? It cannot be worse than PATA drives now can it?