22 Jan
2007
22 Jan
'07
12:29 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 13:14 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Theo Band wrote:
btw, if you're particularly keen to stat at about the RHL 7.3 level then CentOS 2.1 is close, CentOS 3 is close to FC1 (I think)
More RHEL9 than FC1.
Errm. Make that RH9, I don't want to go too far into the future ...
Right ... that one is a hard call ... as it was based on RH9 with some FC1 stuff rolled in to :P