2 Feb
2011
2 Feb
'11
6:22 p.m.
On 02/02/2011 05:22 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al?
Did you ask them ? what did they say ?
Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al?
you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should be in 5.6 soon ?
- KB