Hi all,
Am I right to say that I have to install hylafax-4.2.5-1fc3.x86_64.rpm rather than hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.i386.rpm because the rpm command failed if tried to install the RHEL version. I am running an updated CentOS 4.2 x86_64. Thank you.
Regards, Chin
--- Alexander Dalloz ad+lists@uni-x.org wrote:
Am Di, den 14.03.2006 schrieb Adriano Frare um 19:43:
Then, Install version hylafax-4.2.3-1rhel4
It's work.
Adriano
HylaFax 4.2.5 fixes 2 security issues older versions have:
Security fix - hfaxd vulnerability CVE-2005-3538 Security fix - script vulnerability CVE-2005-3539
Alexander
-- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 02:08:19 up 1 day, 3:56, load average: 0.34, 0.26, 0.15
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos. http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/