Re: [CentOS] yum vs up2date

Matt Hyclak wrote:

<snip>

There may be a valid point here. I don't help manage the centosX servers, so I am unaware if they frequently change locations, etc. If they are relatively static, then perhaps a naming scheme that indicates country or continent of origin would be useful. But again - I don't think most people care. If a server half a world away is faster, I'm going to use that one.

Matt

AAMOF, it hasn't been that many years ago that I would purposely choose a mirror halfway around the world to avoid connection limits and the slowdown that usually takes place before the absolute fixed limit is reached.