On 05/12/2011 09:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
> > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would > take no more than 1 month ? Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
Why? seems like a valid point to me.
- Have you, or anyone else, noticed the speed of the CentOS-5 and
CentOS-4 updates recently? We have spread out the building and checking up updates .. there has been a marked improvement is release speed for updates.
Yes - noted and appreciated
- Have you, or anyone else, noticed that we have started pushing out
the upstream EL Fastrack channel for CentOS-5. In CentOS it is named fasttrack (spelling) on our end due to upstream IP restrictions.
Yes noted
- Have you, or anyone else, noticed the QA tracking site that is open
to the public?
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/
There is a dashboard of recent events:
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/dashboard
There is even an RSS feed:
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/feed
Most of the names who are posting there and taking action are NOT CentOS Project guys, but community people ... isn't that what people were asking for?
Yes - I even saw a calendar with some target and milestones
- Have you, or anyone else, noticed the aggregated list of status
announcements that we now have? The forum moderators are great and they have started an announcement forum area where they aggregate important information:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewforum.php?forum=53
==================================================
It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestions Keep up the great work - Thanks
+1