31 Dec
2005
31 Dec
'05
3 p.m.
What's worse is that it's a *Red Hat* key...
Not sure if that's bad - it's only a SRPMS after all, I'm not even convinced that un-modified SRPMS should be resigned by CentOS (after all what for?)
[ignacio@ignacio ~]$ gpg /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY pub 1024D/DB42A60E 1999-09-23 Red Hat, Inc security@redhat.com sub 2048g/961630A2 1999-09-23
I thought I'd seen those 8 hexdigits before... :)
Cheers, MaZe.