James Bunnell wrote:
> I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
> CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
> 5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
> told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. I then asked if there was a
> way to get a progress report somehow on 5.2, and that 5.2 has already
> upgraded that kernel. The result was that I was banned for being
> correct. I dont understand this kind of support.

Progress report on 5.2 : it will be ready in a few days, expect release 
in a few weeks.