10 Aug
2005
10 Aug
'05
8:21 p.m.
William Warren hescominsoon@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
Ok i am closing this thread. time for a new one..:)
You could have just appended the subject as I did: "RE: Caching nameserver -- BIND(?) caching/forwarding server"
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-August/009628.html
Maybe with something like: "RE: Caching nameserver -- BIND with internal DNS
That way the "subject sorting" mail-clients would still see the relationship. Especially if you reply and Message-ID is still kept intact, so it threads properly too for both proper mail readers as well as Mailman's Pipermail.
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)