3 Jun
2009
3 Jun
'09
3:10 p.m.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
It clearly is the other way round, Red Hat has adopted ours.
Let's see if we can pull that one again! >:)
Ralph