on 6-1-2009 10:49 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-1-2009 9:43 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally did not replace stock components with newer versions.
Any third party repo has the potential to replace base files. That is why the priorities and the protectbase plugins were written.
Obviously they have the potential - and almost equally obviously an end user will have no idea what to choose even if they do have a tiny bit of control over yum (but no way to see where their existing version came from). But I thought that long ago I asked if epel would supply a newer Firefox or OpenOffice (back when it was needed and RHEL hadn't done it yet...) and someone replied that it would not be epel policy to overwrite stock packages. Was that not correct - or have things changed?
EPEL was also asked if they could add a repo tag just so people knew where things came from. That didn't happen either, but much "discussion" did happen. As for EPEL policy, I guess you will have to ask them. Since it is Fedora packages being rebuilt, there is going to have to be some newer things being put in there.