mirror

mirror@lists.centos.org

1 participants
4578 discussions

New list: CentOS-Mirror-Announce
by Ralph Angenendt 26 May '09

26 May '09

Hi, there's a new CentOS mailing list on the block: CentOS-mirror-announce This list is for announcement from the CentOS team to public mirror admins, containing trivia like issues with our mirror network, new releases, changes in how we do mirroring and so on. This list is thought to be for those busy mirror admins, who don't want to follow the centos-mirror list due to too many postings. CentOS-mirror-announce is a very low traffic mailing list. CentOS-mirror-announce is *not* a discussion list. Mirror admins will still be required to announce their newly created mirrors, but if you decide that the traffic gets too much for you, you can subscribe to the mirror-announcement list. The mirror list is subscribed to receive a daily digest of CentOS-mirror-announce, so non-subscribers of the announcement list will not miss any mails going to that list. On behalf of the CentOS team, Ralph Angenendt

1 1

Romanian Mirror Back
by Dani Radulescu 26 May '09

26 May '09

Hello, We had some trouble with our main link transport, we have installed the two backups for the main connection. You can include us to mirror rotation. mirrors.uav.ro -- *Dani Radulescu* IT Specialist *ActivNet* Bd-ul Revolutiei Nr 24 ap 21 Arad T +40 722 699 018 F +40 257 270 617 *www.activnet.info* Motto: Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.

2 1

Re: [CentOS-mirror] ongoing errors from centos.mirror.nac.net
by Stephen Stogner 26 May '09

26 May '09

Hello, Our mirror server has had it's hardware replaced. The yum errors that people were experiencing should now be resolved. We would like to be put back into the mirror rotation again. Thank you.

2 1

Japan or Korea Tier 1
by Richard Ford 26 May '09

26 May '09

G'Day Guys, Great firewall giving me headaches here. Who am I able to peer from for our Tier 1 in China? Cheers, RF.

3 2

new mirror
by Office Apollo Hardware Consulting SRL 26 May '09

26 May '09

New mirror http://lnx.apollo-hw.ro ftp://ftp.apollo-hw.ro Timisoara/Timis/Romania bandwidth =20MB sync 4 time/day I try to add in the past my mirror but nothing is happen maybe I do something wrong can somebody tell me if something is missing from my mail or server config pls? Thanks Marius Ardelean

3 2

New mirror
by Сергей Крашевич 26 May '09

26 May '09

Hello. Some monthes ago i made new CentOs mirror and now i want to add my mirror to official list. Mirror locates in Russia, Moscow and have 1Gb link to internet. Mirror supports ftp,http and rsync protocols: http://mirror.svk.su/centos/ ftp://mirror.svk.su/centos/ rsync://mirror.svk.su::centos/ name of the mirror is simple: mirror.svk.su :) -- Best regards Sergey Krashevich

2 1

centosb3 is now 2.7 days delay.
by Ichihara Takashi 22 May '09

22 May '09

Hi all, Now centosb3 (one of the pdns node for msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd) seems to be having a minor problem. http://centosb3.centos.org/timestamp.txt now (Fri May 22 13:58:51 UTC 2009) shows Tue May 19 20:30:01 UTC 2009 As a result, the status of CentOS mirrors http://mirror-status.centos.org/ shows that there are several (approximately ten) nodes which show of 2.7 days delay. Sorry for posting too many times. Regards, Takashi Ichihara

1 0

Flip-Floping contents at msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd [ Re: flip-flopping timestamp by pulling CentOS [Re: Wrong timestamp by pulling CentOS-incdvd
by Takashi Ichihara 19 May '09

19 May '09

Hi Tru, and CentOS master mirror server Admin. Our user notified that the contents of Centos 4 at our ftp server ftp.riken.jp is flip-flopping between new one and old one in these few days. We already noticed that the time stamp was flip-flopping before in this Mailing list as: On 09.5.5 0:13 PM (UT+9) [CentOS-mirror] flip-flopping timestamp by pulling CentOS [Re: Wrong timestamp by pulling CentOS-incdvd On 09.4.21 11:28 PM (UT+9) [CentOS-mirror] Wrong timestamp by pulling CentOS-incdvd But It was not only the time stamp, but also all the contents at msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd seems to be flip flopping till now. Could you please look into and fix this problem ? We are now now mirroring using the script below, since we cannot believe the time stamp at msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd. rsync -avzH --delete --exclude=timestamp.txt --exclude=TIME --exclude=".~tmp~/" msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd /ftp/Linux/centos date -u > /ftp/Linux/centos/timestamp.txt date +%s > /ftp/Linux/centos/TIME For example, same file was deleted and created and deleted and created in our rsync log to msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd. (We are rsyncing to msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd every 4 hours if the previous rsync process does not exit) A part of the rsync log is shown below. CentOS.log: 2.1/updates/headers/tzdata-0-2009f-1.el2_1.noarch.hdr CentOS.log.4 :deleting 2.1/updates/headers/tzdata-0-2009f-1.el2_1.noarch.hdr CentOS.log:8 2.1/updates/headers/tzdata-0-2009f-1.el2_1.noarch.hdr CentOS.log.17 :deleting 2.1/updates/headers/tzdata-0-2009f-1.el2_1.noarch.hdr (time zone of the log files beleow is JST = UT+8) -rw-rw-r-- 1 archive archive 30662 May 19 18:42 CentOS.log -rw-rw-r-- 1 archive archive 91659 May 19 18:15 CentOS.log.4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 archive archive 84518 May 19 18:03 CentOS.log.8 -rw-rw-r-- 1 archive archive 91493 May 18 18:24 CentOS.log.17 Thank you in advance. Regards, Takashi Ichihara 09.5.11 5:26 PM Tru Huynh wrote, > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:28:54PM +0900, Takashi Ichihara wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> ( I resubmit a mail to the Centos-morror List for your information) >> (sorry to sent again, because previous one was sorted in the >> different thread in the ML archives) >> >> >> Tru Huynh wrote, >> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/centos/ is being listed as 12 days late. >>>> >>>> Any issue on your mirror or on the centos mirror your are >>>> pulling from? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Tru >>>> >> Hi >> >> Yes, we ftp.riken.jp are pulling from the CentOS master site by >> rsync -avzH --delete msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd /ftp/Linux/centos >> >> every 4 hours when the previous rsync to msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd >> is not running. In addition, we kill the previous rsync once a day if there >> is a previous rsync to msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd running and start >> a new rsync to msync.centos.org::CentOS-incdvd . >> > ... > > We have lost (hoster pinged but no reply since 10+days) 2 donated centos.org > servers one of them being listed in the msync/msync-dvd pdns list. They have > now been removed but the dvd mirrors centos.org server count has been reduced. > > Best regards, > > Tru > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >

2 1

Question about becoming a mirror
by Vadtec 15 May '09

15 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am interested in becoming a CentOS mirror, but when I looked at the How To, it didn't bother to say how much HD space it is going to require. I have a large amount of BW to spare, but HD space is premium for me. Rather than wasting resources and downloading the entire mirror like it suggest, I figure it's better to ask here. So, how much space would be required to mirror the entire setup? I may also look at mirroring just the 5.X series out of necessity. Is that allowed as a public mirror? Any help is greatly appreciated. Vadtec vadtec(a)vadtec.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKCeWTAAoJEEJXIw5V8giejF0P/1mHnaZ8Wm0LiAhN2amKjkIc XxdQ1WAt3Wu6cnxkh4u7M9WLJ50zhC86WNhC7lA5rdWoCYz+8zg9m37BX3/FYN3x bpQytQcxSXY3La+mnf7EIOh6FNnfSl5oSOz7sxO+KGRDobpcvrDV2kuqTNqi8vmf sNe2IbNt4cD2hrAJZYIdFCYauEs9V0HSnlyt/krJYm3nWC25ZwfV48waxB48bw+J V3ucKtZX6OdmrfRN0OpXxKetXvvhr9sJuCbXJ8zmBH+XXPo+UxSjkyOC0Ad+U9lr u/tWQ+vXNKn92Q18bZa32EYDDOTNZrX7l7eVuS7lrwSnJVe4m2C97QP9qFBfBaCR Lf3g+8j33GRAwBws4iwBCE/9k5k00YsiiHntFBdh9p8Fq7FEQxy4L7SxKldr55Lj Zhcj3EveJRGiCunIWSKE02kP0Kck85qtPgJ62+FY1X2lEQUVSfVXT4zISx+nWEsg LXFKi+ziIyVpaWGQPNtd5NPWgjntkG5ZAw9lZIy2rEX4OooOg9sRf7B7q5SWCnoF 3XrnAN47hLXYEP4h7Noxvv/OORNRp6PTT4TntapnB4PrmGEMLOcp1VBbid9KxVLY h65dKgjdkR+ucrLuJxLpQNVPbfesvcTUlu3EWdVoizHOxXOXplfTrv3AbVTuYqpQ 8NhvYn+7wmKa1+xADxoe =Cg0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

11 12

push based mirroring
by Karanbir Singh 15 May '09

15 May '09

Something I posted on the blog, and I'd appreciate comments from this list about: -------------------------------------------------- Has anyone given though to doing mirror updates via a 'push' rather than a 'pull' mechanism ? Basically, when new packages are available the machines that get updates would do a rsync to the machines down the order, pushing the updates out. It would allow us to get more updates, out faster and also not need to waste cpu and i/o on repeated rsyncs that dont need to be run. Yes, we could/would/should still leave in place some mechanism for people to setup new mirrors and also to do pull based rsync's as and when they need. Just something to think about at the moment, and comments would be very welcome. - KB

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

mirror