2 Jul
2008
2 Jul
'08
3:25 p.m.
Brandon Davidson wrote:
Brandon Davidson wrote:
I guess I never paid all that much attention to it before just now, but has the CentOS 5 tree always been missing the HEADER.html and HEADER.images links? It's not pretty any more :(
Also, why are the directories inside /5 individually linked to their current version, instead of directly linking /5 to /5.2 as was done with the 4 series?
No response to this? CentOS 4 just gets to be prettier than 5? Maybe I'll see if anyone bites on IRC.
It is done that way because we where going to do a 5.1.x, 5.2.x, etc.
now it has been in place for 2 releases
I don't think we should now change it