I was thinking from a load and reliability perspective. If the mirrors it has now are all it makes sense to have...

There are many uses for the vault, SRPMS as you said, and older ISOs+packages are useful when simulating upgrades. Both of which I've used it for in the past. 
-Paulson

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 18/02/15 23:11, Paulson McIntyre wrote:
> Is there any need for more vault.centos.org <http://vault.centos.org>
> mirrors? If it's less than 2TiB I can add one for it. Just not sure if
> there is any point or not.
> -Paulson

Well, I still think than vault is like giving people a gun to shoot in
their own foot : you'd be surprized how much people are directly
pointing their yum config to vault, to stick to a particular version,
and so letting their machine vulnerable.

At least for binary RPMS. for SRPMS, that has a reason to exist.

- --

Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlTl258ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4eWgCdESDFBVLslHgK46sYZmR0XoM3
vvYAn39LWuCr8BfZlAvwtwZkL+GuoNdq
=L0z6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-mirror mailing list
CentOS-mirror@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror