I have a similar question.
On mirrors.tripadvisor.com we are pulling from
rsync://mirror.symnds.com/CentOS-vault-full
We are serving the content as:
rsync://mirrors.tripadvisor.com/centos-vault http://mirrors.tripadvisor.com/centos-vault/
We’re happy to be listed as a public mirror for this content.
Does it make sense for us to pull it from somewhere closer to the origin?
james
On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev ftpadmin@kernel.org wrote:
On 18 November 2014 at 07:24, Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org wrote:
Well, I don't know how kernel.org and/or leaseweb.net were mirroring vault content (reposync ? lftp script ?), but we don't even list thoses as a valid Vault servers. Have you read http://vault.centos.org/readme.txt ? it contains the info you're looking for (including some rsync targets from machines with high-speed connections)
Hi, all:
Sorry, I managed to miss this. I'm not sure how long ago this stopped working, but in our (admittedly very old) configuration we have the following source to pull for archive.kernel.org:
rsync://vault.centos.org/centos-full-store/
Is this requiring IP whitelisting these days, or what needs to happen to make it possible for us to pull the vault data "from the horse's mouth?" :)
-K _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror