Hi Tru
Yes, it make sense but not related to CentOS Mirror. We both ISP has a lot of customer who talk / video Conference/ Internet Gaming each other. In this case we have to reroute via our upstream cause load on Internet Traffic. If we both get peer, you know, we can save expensive bandwidth, mean money, which can be use to promote / support GNU Projects.
I hope you understand the issue. Dear List member, please forgave us, if you feel disturb on this issue. By they way, Both Data Center is just within 3km. By deploying 3km overhead fiber, we can save money on long term.
Hasan, Please reply.
Thanks Ahamed Bauani
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Tru Huynh tru@centos.org wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:20:08AM +0600, Nyamul Hassan wrote:
I just tried with the "cc" data inside the URLs, and at this time (04:15hrs UTC) it is showing the other Bangladesh mirror when using "&cc=bd", but it is not showing up our host. Also, when I tried to refresh this page, often it goes to a resultset that is quite "far far away!"
http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing both mirrors as up to date, both should be listed... :(
Ok, some typo (my bad, missing trailing / for the URL) Your mirror should appear at the next round.
By the way I have put BD and fill up with IN-CN-HK-SG-VN countries, does that make sense with your peering access?
Best regards,
Tru
-- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror