When we access the following page from Japan, it shows only three Japanese mirrors although there are eight available mirrors. http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/
Could someone fix this?
Regards,
Am 23.09.10 15:50, schrieb Kazuhiro Fujieda:
When we access the following page from Japan, it shows only three Japanese mirrors although there are eight available mirrors. http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/
Can you send the complete content of that page, so that I can see which are on there, which aren't and maybe find out why?
Thank you.
Ralph
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:47:28 +0200 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com said:
Can you send the complete content of that page, so that I can see which are on there, which aren't and maybe find out why?
I attatched two files. One is the content of http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/. Another is the content of http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/i386/ for comparison.
Regards,
Am 27.09.10 10:10, schrieb Kazuhiro Fujieda:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:47:28 +0200 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com said:
Can you send the complete content of that page, so that I can see which are on there, which aren't and maybe find out why?
I attatched two files. One is the content of http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/. Another is the content of http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/i386/ for comparison.
Yeah, the i386 is correct, for x86_64 I see correct numbers for the actual isos (8 hosts each), for the DVD I see 3 hosts and for the directory I also only see three hosts, which isn't correct indeed.
The number of DVD hosts isn't correct either for x86_64 (and i386).
Thanks for notification, I'm not sure yet what that is.
Ralph
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:28:13 +0200 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com said:
Yeah, the i386 is correct, for x86_64 I see correct numbers for the actual isos (8 hosts each), for the DVD I see 3 hosts and for the directory I also only see three hosts, which isn't correct indeed.
The number of DVD hosts isn't correct either for x86_64 (and i386).
Thanks for notification, I'm not sure yet what that is.
The problem is still there. Could you solve it?
Am 30.10.10 17:25, schrieb Kazuhiro Fujieda:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:28:13 +0200 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com said:
Yeah, the i386 is correct, for x86_64 I see correct numbers for the actual isos (8 hosts each), for the DVD I see 3 hosts and for the directory I also only see three hosts, which isn't correct indeed.
The number of DVD hosts isn't correct either for x86_64 (and i386).
Thanks for notification, I'm not sure yet what that is.
The problem is still there. Could you solve it?
No, not really. Our crawler walks all hosts and then should put them into the lists. But it only does this for the 3.9 DVD, the 4.8 and 5.5 DVDs come back as bad.
Can you look if the md5sums on your mirror check out okay? I'm not really sure why they are flagged as bad.
Ralph
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:19:09 +0200 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com said:
Can you look if the md5sums on your mirror check out okay? I'm not really sure why they are flagged as bad.
I have checked the md5sums of all ISO images on our mirror. There is no problem. Can you show me the log of the crawler about ftp.jaist.ac.jp?
Am 31.10.10 15:16, schrieb Kazuhiro Fujieda:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:19:09 +0200 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com said:
Can you look if the md5sums on your mirror check out okay? I'm not really sure why they are flagged as bad.
I have checked the md5sums of all ISO images on our mirror. There is no problem. Can you show me the log of the crawler about ftp.jaist.ac.jp?
It doesn't say much more than "bad dvd", especially not *why* it flags it as bad :)
Probably have to dive into the code to see why that happens.
Ralph
-
Kazuhiro Fujieda -
Ralph Angenendt