RE: http://centos.technutopia.com
Provided by https://technutopia.com
It should be working as a full mirror with updates every 6 hours. Depending on traffic it might have to be moved to another server with a 5 mbps upstream.
On Mo 14 Mai 2012 13:36:08 CEST, TechNutopia wrote:
RE: http://centos.technutopia.com
Provided by https://technutopia.com
It should be working as a full mirror with updates every 6 hours. Depending on traffic it might have to be moved to another server with a 5 mbps upstream.
On which kind of upstream is it right now (and no, I don't really want to hand out people a 5 mbps link in a country where we have much faster mirrors available).
Cheers,
Ralph
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 23:20 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mo 14 Mai 2012 13:36:08 CEST, TechNutopia wrote:
RE: http://centos.technutopia.com
Provided by https://technutopia.com
It should be working as a full mirror with updates every 6 hours. Depending on traffic it might have to be moved to another server with a 5 mbps upstream.
On which kind of upstream is it right now (and no, I don't really want to hand out people a 5 mbps link in a country where we have much faster mirrors available).
Cheers,
Ralph
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 23:20 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mo 14 Mai 2012 13:36:08 CEST, TechNutopia wrote:
RE: http://centos.technutopia.com
Provided by https://technutopia.com
It should be working as a full mirror with updates every 6 hours. Depending on traffic it might have to be moved to another server with a 5 mbps upstream.
On which kind of upstream is it right now (and no, I don't really want to hand out people a 5 mbps link in a country where we have much faster mirrors available).
Cheers,
Ralph
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
On 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Most of the US is quite well seeded at this point, thats true. What AS are you operating out of ?
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:51 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Most of the US is quite well seeded at this point, thats true. What AS are you operating out of ?
AS?
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:14:59PM -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:51 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Most of the US is quite well seeded at this point, thats true. What AS are you operating out of ?
AS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_System_%28Internet%29
I'm running 100+ mb with Speed Boost Commercial Internet with Comcast and unlimited bandwidth/pr day. Bandwidth is not a problem at all. My average speeds are around 92-98 mb usually. Let me know if I can help with the Cent OS distro. I am in Hendersonville TN about 20-30 North East of Nashville TN. Thank you Kevin V
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bryan Seitz seitz@bsd-unix.net wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:14:59PM -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:51 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd
understand
it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Most of the US is quite well seeded at this point, thats true. What AS are you operating out of ?
AS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_System_%28Internet%29
--
Bryan G. Seitz _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
Also i'm running Static IP's. I have one server i'm setting up tonight that will be mainly for downloads for websites and customers. Only downloads will be held on it. I will be running dual cat5e on it to increase bandwidth travel.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kevin VanConant kvanconant09@gmail.comwrote:
I'm running 100+ mb with Speed Boost Commercial Internet with Comcast and unlimited bandwidth/pr day. Bandwidth is not a problem at all. My average speeds are around 92-98 mb usually. Let me know if I can help with the Cent OS distro. I am in Hendersonville TN about 20-30 North East of Nashville TN. Thank you Kevin V
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bryan Seitz seitz@bsd-unix.net wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:14:59PM -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:51 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo
of
traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd
understand
it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Most of the US is quite well seeded at this point, thats true. What AS are you operating out of ?
AS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_System_%28Internet%29
--
Bryan G. Seitz _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:51 -0400, Bryan Seitz wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:14:59PM -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:51 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Most of the US is quite well seeded at this point, thats true. What AS are you operating out of ?
AS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_System_%28Internet%29
54020
On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my time during the last week.
We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that can - at least during release time) happen.
If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the torrent seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
Regards,
Ralph
I don't have a data cap. I'm running on an average 94+mb with no data cap. I'm about to configure my switch to run both eth0 and eth1 to run together so I should be at 100+ still with no cap. Thanks Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: Ralph Angenendt ralph.angenendt@gmail.com Sender: centos-mirror-bounces@centos.org Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:43:06 To: centos-mirror@centos.org Reply-To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." centos-mirror@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] New Mirror
On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my time during the last week.
We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that can - at least during release time) happen.
If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the torrent seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
Regards,
Ralph _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:43 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my time during the last week.
We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that can - at least during release time) happen.
If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the torrent seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
Regards,
Ralph
Ok, will change to torrents.
Oh ok ill do that Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: TechNutopia CentOS@TechNutopia.Com Sender: centos-mirror-bounces@centos.org Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:09 To: Mailing list for CentOS mirrors.centos-mirror@centos.org Reply-To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." centos-mirror@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] New Mirror
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:43 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't need this one?
Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my time during the last week.
We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that can - at least during release time) happen.
If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the torrent seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
Regards,
Ralph
Ok, will change to torrents.
_______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 11:38 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:43 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo
of
traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd
understand
it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS
doesn't
need this one?
Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my
time
during the last week.
We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that
can -
at least during release time) happen.
If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the
torrent
seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
Regards,
Ralph
Ok, will change to torrents.
Removed monthly bandwidth usage limit, http only, rsync from us-msync.centos.org::CentOS 4 times/day. It's allocated at 100mbps, but it's allowed extended bursts of 400mbps.
I think it's good to go.
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:21 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 11:38 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:43 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo
of
traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd
understand
it not being listed.
I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS
doesn't
need this one?
Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my
time
during the last week.
We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that
can -
at least during release time) happen.
If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the
torrent
seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
Regards,
Ralph
Ok, will change to torrents.
Removed monthly bandwidth usage limit, http only, rsync from us-msync.centos.org::CentOS 4 times/day. It's allocated at 100mbps, but it's allowed extended bursts of 400mbps.
I think it's good to go.
Strange, it's not performing well--Don't add it to the list. Sorry.
-
Bryan Seitz -
Jeff Fisher -
Karanbir Singh -
Kevin VanConant -
kvanconant09＠gmail.com
-
Ralph Angenendt -
TechNutopia