Marko,
----- "Marko Bevc" marko@bevc.net wrote:
It has been released today. When is is expected for CentOS beta to be available?
Actually, RHEL 5.4 beta came out a month ago (2009-7-1). See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2009-July/msg00000.html
When is CentOS going to have a beta of 5.4? Given the fact that the beta period is supposed to end August 13th... and the fact that RHEL 4.8 came out 2009-05-19 and CentOS 4.8 is still in progress... not any time soon. I'm not trying to criticize, just being realistic.
TYL,
On 08/01/2009 03:41 PM, Scott Dowdle wrote:
Marko,
----- "Marko Bevc"marko@bevc.net wrote:
It has been released today. When is is expected for CentOS beta to be available?
Actually, RHEL 5.4 beta came out a month ago (2009-7-1). See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2009-July/msg00000.html
When is CentOS going to have a beta of 5.4?
have we ever had a beta for a mid-release non-public code spin from upstream ?
Karanbir,
----- "Karanbir Singh" mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 08/01/2009 03:41 PM, Scott Dowdle wrote:
Marko,
----- "Marko Bevc"marko@bevc.net wrote:
It has been released today. When is is expected for CentOS beta to available?
Actually, RHEL 5.4 beta came out a month ago (2009-7-1). See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2009-July/msg00000.html
When is CentOS going to have a beta of 5.4?
have we ever had a beta for a mid-release non-public code spin from upstream ?
Not that I have noticed.
TYL,
Scott Dowdle wrote:
Karanbir,
----- "Karanbir Singh" mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
have we ever had a beta for a mid-release non-public code spin from upstream ?
Not that I have noticed.
Probably because Red Hat does not offer sources for the beta ...
Cheers,
Ralph
Sorry missed that date. Thank everyone. Hoping for the best that RH opens all 5.4 sources.
Regads, Marko On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Scott Dowdle wrote:
Marko,
----- "Marko Bevc" marko@bevc.net wrote:
It has been released today. When is is expected for CentOS beta to be available?
Actually, RHEL 5.4 beta came out a month ago (2009-7-1). See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2009-July/msg00000.html
When is CentOS going to have a beta of 5.4? Given the fact that the beta period is supposed to end August 13th... and the fact that RHEL 4.8 came out 2009-05-19 and CentOS 4.8 is still in progress... not any time soon. I'm not trying to criticize, just being realistic.
TYL,
aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its all gpled afaik
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Marko Bevc marko@bevc.net wrote:
Sorry missed that date. Thank everyone. Hoping for the best that RH opens all 5.4 sources.
Regads, Marko On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Scott Dowdle wrote:
Marko,
----- "Marko Bevc" marko@bevc.net wrote:
It has been released today. When is is expected for CentOS beta to be available?
Actually, RHEL 5.4 beta came out a month ago (2009-7-1). See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2009-July/msg00000.html
When is CentOS going to have a beta of 5.4? Given the fact that the beta
period is supposed to end August 13th... and the fact that RHEL 4.8 came out 2009-05-19 and CentOS 4.8 is still in progress... not any time soon. I'm not trying to criticize, just being realistic.
TYL,
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
Squadra Squadra wrote:
aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its all gpled afaik
CentOS only uses what is published and doesn't need an RHN account - meaning all the things you can find on ftp.redhat.com.
Ralph
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Squadra Squadra wrote:
aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its all gpled afaik
CentOS only uses what is published and doesn't need an RHN account - meaning all the things you can find on ftp.redhat.com.
What Ralph said, but also, the collection of licenses on the sources are clearly not only GPL variants. Any rebuilder of non-freely available source content (i.e., here, from RHN) may want to do their own inventory.
-- Russ herrold
On 01/08/09 20:03, Squadra Squadra wrote:
aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its all gpled afaik
I don't think rh will put a contract on you, but it definitely isn't the meaning to but what you get in rhn just online
but the better question is, why would CentOS "waist" time in compiling and testing a beta that will be a final release soon? (eta is end of august if I remember well) Seems to me as overkill, isn't their enough work already?
Already end of August? Then it is definitely pointeless.
regards, Marko On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Tosh wrote:
On 01/08/09 20:03, Squadra Squadra wrote:
aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its all gpled afaik
I don't think rh will put a contract on you, but it definitely isn't the meaning to but what you get in rhn just online
but the better question is, why would CentOS "waist" time in compiling and testing a beta that will be a final release soon? (eta is end of august if I remember well) Seems to me as overkill, isn't their enough work already?
jep you are right. but theres nothging illeagl in spreading the seaces stuff (all gpl)
correct my if am i amwrong
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Tosh toshlinux@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/09 20:03, Squadra Squadra wrote:
aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its all gpled afaik
I don't think rh will put a contract on you, but it definitely isn't the meaning to but what you get in rhn just online
but the better question is, why would CentOS "waist" time in compiling and testing a beta that will be a final release soon? (eta is end of august if I remember well) Seems to me as overkill, isn't their enough work already?
-- Toshaan toshlinux@gmail.com - http://www.toshaan.be _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
-
Karanbir Singh -
Marko Bevc -
R P Herrold -
Ralph Angenendt -
Scott Dowdle -
Squadra Squadra -
Tosh