FIrstly Centos is primarily a RHEL
clone.
This means that the primary design decisions are to be as RHEL
like as possible.
After that there are additions and upgrades.
Secondly Fedora does not actively support Xen.
As a long time Xen and RH/Fedora user I have spent lots of time
building/rebuilding broken/missing packages in Fedora.
Quite frankly Xen under Fedora is somewhat broken.
Libvirt support for KVM is very good because RH pays people to
support KVM.
Xen under the old config format has reasonable support(possibly
60% of features) but under libxl the support is much worse
(possibly 30% of features).
Thirdly RedHat has been active at times to remove Xen support in
favour of KVM(Their own virtualization technology).
Xen has been driven to some extents by the needs of Citrix and
although they have helped others build packages for Fedora and
libvirt its a good will effort and its hard to expect Citrix to
spend effort on work that may not be in their best corporate
interests.
On 09/08/2015 09:02 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> not fragment to a bunch of different individual people
making a bunch of
> different RPM sets that the community does not know who
produces, etc.
>
what you're doing its a complete crap, what you said
is different from what you did, why you' (centos virt sig) not
contributed to the work of fedora guys instead of reinventing
the wheel ?
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
--
Alvin Starr || voice: (905)513-7688
Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
alvin@netvel.net ||