Sorry for the top post, blackberry.
Well I like to be able to install my machines in the xenstore with 'xm new'
and then manage them from there, but virt-install and virsh are useful
too, so I just use CentOS base then replace their xen with the one from
xen.org keeping libvirt and now I have the best of both worlds.
The commercial one isn't without gripes too. Like I wish they had
developed a fully web based interface for creating and managing virtual
machines like the one Microsoft has in their virtual server instead of the
standalone java client. I never really like standalone java clients as it makes
it one more thing you have to reach for when you need to get something
done, when there is almost always a web browser available.
-Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: centos-virt-bounces@centos.org <centos-virt-bounces@centos.org>
To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS <centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Thu Mar 20 17:34:08 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] RE: [CentOS] Running CentOS 4.6 domUs on CentOS5.1 dom0 and domUscrash
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> glues the Xen 3.0.3 user land tools onto a highly patched 3.1
> hypervisor forcing the user to try and use their swiss army
> knife libvirt to manage the mess. Ugh! I just want Xen and
> to manage it through Xen!
I quite like the virsh and virt-install stuff included in the distro, I
think xen tools themselves are quite pedestrian at the moment. Perhaps
their commercial offerings are better - for me, the libvirt and virsh
make Xen a lot more usable
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt