Search results for "Linux ./configure"

[CentOS-devel] CentOS and Scientific Linux Cern installations with FAI

by lange＠fai-project.org

I'm very happy to announce, that FAI (Fully automatic Installation) now can install and configure CentOS and Scientific Linux Cern (SLC). You can use a Debian FAI server for installing CentOS version 5 and 6 or SLC 5 and 6. As an example I've also built a FAI multi-distribution CD which installs those three different Linux distributions with different configurations. Get this ISO image from http://fai-project.org/fai-cd/ This installation is very quick. I've done a CentOS 6.0 installation (with graphical desktop) in 199 seconds (in a kvm instance on a quad-core 3.2GHz, hard disk in RAM) and it only needs 490 seconds on the real hardware when installing from CD. A short description how to install CentOS or SLC via network from your FAI server is described in this mail: https://lists.uni-koeln.de/pipermail/linux-fai/2011-September/009243.html Feedback is always welcome. Please send your feedback to the linux-fai mailing list https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-fai/ Best regards, Thomas, in behalf of the FAI team About FAI: FAI is a non-interactive system to install, customize and manage Linux systems and software configurations on computers as well as virtual machines and chroot environments, from small networks to large infrastructures and clusters. Compared to kickstart, FAI is more flexible and includes a powerfull class mechanism to build a configuration from multiple building blocks. It also includes the features of cobbler. The project was started in 1999 for the Debian distribution. Later Ubuntu support was added and some time ago we start adding RPM support.

14 years, 6 months

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and Intel vPro?

by Daniel Bird

On 16/11/2013 04:26, Lists wrote: > From what I've read, Intel's vPro allows for all of > these possibilities, although it does seem to be heavily Windows oriented. Does this help? https://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert/blog/2011/11/03/intel-se… https://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert/blog/2012/01/19/configur… https://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert/blog/2012/02/13/configur… http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/download-the-latest-intel-amt-open… Dan

12 years, 4 months

Re: [CentOS] NDOutils ./configure results; do I need gcc?

by umair shakil

Salam!!! yum install gcc yum install gcc-c++ Its my habit whenever i make any server, i must intall these to packages Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 10/11/07, Rogelio <scubacuda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I am trying to trying to "./configure" NDOutils on a CentOS 4.4 box > with a minimal install, but it gives me the following error, which I > assume means I need something gcc-related? > > *********************./configure output ******************** > ************************************************************** > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > checking for gcc... no > checking for cc... no > checking for cc... no > checking for cl... no > configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH > See `config.log' for more details. > ************************************************************** > ************************************************************** > > I did a "yum search gcc" and found several packages that look like > they might be what I need. I assume that it's "gcc-c++" that I need? > > (And for what it's worth, here is my config.log results) > > ******************** config.log ***************************** > ************************************************************** > ************************************************************** > This file contains any messages produced by compilers while > running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. > > It was created by configure, which was > generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59. Invocation command line was > > $ ./configure > > ## --------- ## > ## Platform. ## > ## --------- ## > > hostname = localhost.localdomain > uname -m = i686 > uname -r = 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > uname -s = Linux > uname -v = #1 SMP Sat Aug 12 09:39:11 CDT 2006 > > /usr/bin/uname -p = unknown > /bin/uname -X = unknown > > /bin/arch = i686 > /usr/bin/arch -k = unknown > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > hostinfo = unknown > /bin/machine = unknown > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > /bin/universe = unknown > > PATH: /usr/kerberos/sbin > PATH: /usr/kerberos/bin > PATH: /usr/local/sbin > PATH: /usr/local/bin > PATH: /sbin > PATH: /bin > PATH: /usr/sbin > PATH: /usr/bin > PATH: /usr/X11R6/bin > PATH: /root/bin > > > ## ----------- ## > ## Core tests. ## > ## ----------- ## > > configure:1337: checking for a BSD-compatible install > configure:1392: result: /usr/bin/install -c > configure:1411: checking build system type > configure:1429: result: i686-pc-linux-gnu > configure:1437: checking host system type > configure:1451: result: i686-pc-linux-gnu > configure:1506: checking for gcc > configure:1535: result: no > configure:1586: checking for cc > configure:1615: result: no > configure:1628: checking for cc > configure:1674: result: no > configure:1727: checking for cl > configure:1756: result: no > configure:1770: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH > See `config.log' for more details. > > ## ---------------- ## > ## Cache variables. ## > ## ---------------- ## > > ac_cv_build=i686-pc-linux-gnu > ac_cv_build_alias=i686-pc-linux-gnu > ac_cv_env_CC_set= > ac_cv_env_CC_value= > ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_set= > ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value= > ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set= > ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_value= > ac_cv_env_CPP_set= > ac_cv_env_CPP_value= > ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_set= > ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_value= > ac_cv_env_build_alias_set= > ac_cv_env_build_alias_value= > ac_cv_env_host_alias_set= > ac_cv_env_host_alias_value= > ac_cv_env_target_alias_set= > ac_cv_env_target_alias_value= > ac_cv_host=i686-pc-linux-gnu > ac_cv_host_alias=i686-pc-linux-gnu > ac_cv_path_install='/usr/bin/install -c' > > ## ----------------- ## > ## Output variables. ## > ## ----------------- ## > > CC='' > CFLAGS='' > CPP='' > CPPFLAGS='' > DBCFLAGS='' > DBLDFLAGS='' > DBLIBS='' > DEFS='' > ECHO_C='' > ECHO_N='-n' > ECHO_T='' > EGREP='' > EXEEXT='' > INSTALL='/usr/bin/install -c' > INSTALL_DATA='${INSTALL} -m 644' > INSTALL_PROGRAM='${INSTALL}' > INSTALL_SCRIPT='${INSTALL}' > LDFLAGS='' > LIBOBJS='' > LIBS='' > LIBWRAPLIBS='' > LTLIBOBJS='' > MOD_CFLAGS='' > MOD_LDFLAGS='' > OBJEXT='' > OTHERLIBS='' > PACKAGE_BUGREPORT='' > PACKAGE_NAME='' > PACKAGE_STRING='' > PACKAGE_TARNAME='' > PACKAGE_VERSION='' > PATH_SEPARATOR=':' > SET_MAKE='' > SHELL='/bin/sh' > SOCKETLIBS='' > ac_ct_CC='' > bindir='${exec_prefix}/bin' > build='i686-pc-linux-gnu' > build_alias='' > build_cpu='i686' > build_os='linux-gnu' > build_vendor='pc' > datadir='${prefix}/share' > exec_prefix='NONE' > host='i686-pc-linux-gnu' > host_alias='' > host_cpu='i686' > host_os='linux-gnu' > host_vendor='pc' > includedir='${prefix}/include' > infodir='${prefix}/info' > libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib' > libexecdir='${exec_prefix}/libexec' > localstatedir='${prefix}/var' > mandir='${prefix}/man' > oldincludedir='/usr/include' > prefix='NONE' > program_transform_name='s,x,x,' > sbindir='${exec_prefix}/sbin' > sharedstatedir='${prefix}/com' > sysconfdir='${prefix}/etc' > target_alias='' > ## ----------- ## > ## confdefs.h. ## > ## ----------- ## > > #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" > #define PACKAGE_NAME "" > #define PACKAGE_STRING "" > #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "" > #define PACKAGE_VERSION "" > > configure: exit 1 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

18 years, 5 months

Re: [CentOS] Install OpenSSL 1.1.1 on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core).

by Anand Buddhdev

On 09/11/2021 18:30, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Kaushal, > #cd Python-3.10.0 > #*./configure LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64/openssl11"* You really are making no effort to understand how to compile packages on Linux. Steve told you that you might need to use LDFLAGS, but it is not the only option you have to set when calling configure. You also need to tell configure where the header files are. Instead of examining the output of "configure --help" or using google, you're just asking to be spoon-fed all the solutions. Try to help yourself by doing some google searching and reading. Anand

4 years, 4 months

Re: [CentOS] How & where to add

by Paul Heinlein

On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Siva Prasad Nath wrote: > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.50.2 > netmask 255.255.255.0 That's a configuration for a Linux system running Debian or Ubuntu Linux. CentOS (the topic of this mailing list) and other distributions in the Red Hat family use a completely different syntax for network configuration. If you're completely new to Linux, I'd suggest you find a local Linux user group and get some hands-on help. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein(a)madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W

10 years, 4 months

[CentOS] Migrating windows to linux proxy server

by lingu

HI, I am migraing from windows to linux squid proxy server.I configured squid its working fine.But i want to integrate with windows 2003 Active Directory Service for user authentication.Can any one help me in configuring the same. its very urgent for me. Thanks in advance lingu

17 years, 9 months

Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?

by Bernard Lheureux

On 18/07/2018 17:04, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: Zarafa is also a very good Linux Exchange Like !!! > Good evening from Singapore, > > I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based > SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim. > > Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important > consideration factor. > > Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are > relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are > extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely > time-consuming. > > One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create > additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can > Linux-based SMTP servers do that? > > Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based > SMTP servers? > > Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally, > Linux is far more secure than Windows. > > Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher percentage of the market share? > > Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE for a period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail Transport Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually. -- (°- Bernard Lheureux //\ Linux System Administrator v_/_ MailTo:bernard@lheureux.be

7 years, 8 months

Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?

by Keith Keller

On 2018-07-19, Nicolas Kovacs <info(a)microlinux.fr> wrote: > I'd say mail > servers are not the easiest thing to configure under Linux. A public SMTP server is not the easiest thing to configure, period. It is the quintessential rope on which many admins hang themselves. --keith -- kkeller(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us

7 years, 8 months

Re: [CentOS] Disabling services in CentOS 5.5

by Miguel Medalha

The following NSA document provides very good information on the secure configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5/CentOS 5.x: Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/redhat/rhel5-guide-i731.pdf It goes through almost all the services and gives you guidance on whether and how you should disable a service.

15 years, 9 months

[CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?

by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming

Good evening from Singapore, I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim. Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important consideration factor. Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely time-consuming. One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can Linux-based SMTP servers do that? Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based SMTP servers? Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally, Linux is far more secure than Windows. Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher percentage of the market share? Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE for a period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail Transport Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually. Please advise. Thank you very much. ===BEGIN SIGNATURE=== Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017 [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ <https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/> [2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ <http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/> [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming <https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming> ===END SIGNATURE===

7 years, 8 months

Search results for query "Linux ./configure"