Search results for "Linux ./configure"

Re: [CentOS] ./configure perfparse -> "configure: error: required library libgd unusable"

by Rogelio

> > > I see the libXpm-devel rpm here, but not for CentOS 4.x > > http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libxpm-devel > > > And here is one for the i386 platform. Is that good? > > > ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/libXpm-devel… > > Just found this one for CentOS http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/4066720/com/libXpm-devel-3.5.5-…

18 years, 3 months

[CentOS-virt] Xen Hypervisor HELP?

by Mark Smith

Hi Everyone, I am new to Xen Hypervisor and wanted to know if someone has any good guides to configuring it please. Also once i configure a Guest OS how can i connect to it remotely via a windows and linux machine? Thanks Rockyuk

15 years, 1 month

Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?

by mark

Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > > I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based > SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim. > > Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important > consideration factor. > > Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are > relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are > extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely > time-consuming. Based on experience at a number of jobs, Exchange may appear to be easy to configure, but as soon as you get past the utterly basic configuration, when management or other departments want more, it then becomes a major headache. I work for a US federal contractor these days, on site (civilian sector) and they just gave up, and moved to M$ cloud for it. And most people HATE IT. Searching, if you're not using Outlook, is either terrrible or nonexistant (they've started auto-archiving here, and I'm hearing there is no search). In addition, if you go to 365, you are NOT BUYING the software, you're renting the service. You will be paying every year, and a service contract will cost, and, presumably, cost more every year. Linux, once you get over the learning curve, is not that difficult to administer. and there's a lot of online help (just don't expect us to do your job for you, as a few folks who've posted here over the years seeem to expect). You can also get contract help. If that's important, you might consider upstream, who do provide paid support. And it will cost a lot less than M$. > > One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create > additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can > Linux-based SMTP servers do that? I don't know of any mail system that you cannot do that in. Every one allows that. <snip> > Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally, > Linux is far more secure than Windows. > Yup. And fixes come a *LOT* faster, often in hours or days, as opposed to M$'s "there's no probem, it's your fault (insert one week to three months), ok, ok, we've got a fix > > Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher > percentage of the market share? Back in the last century, the old mainframe line was "nobody ever lost their job by recommending IBM"; since the nineties, it's been "recommending Windows", because that's all they know. We won't say how much M$ pays, both for advertising, FUD, and illegal under the table payments to manufacturers. > > Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE > for a period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail > Transport Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually. > Yup. mark

7 years, 8 months

Re: [CentOS] kernel not booting after update

by John R Pierce

> The raid is indeed an Intel Matrix RAID. The BIOS is configured so that > the sata controller is in RAID mode, and the "OPROM" is set to Matrix > Raid. > I would backup ALL your file systems off that disk, perhaps using a Linux rescue CD, then configure the controller in the BIOS for JBOD, use a rescue disk to build mdraid partitions, and restore your files from the backups. you may have to rebuild the /boot/initrd on the system to dump the fakeraid (dmraid) driver and enable the mdraid native linux raid driver Fake Raid like Intel Matrix Raid is NOT recommended for linux/unix systems http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2005/09/fake-raid-fraid-sucks-even-more-at.html someone's procedure for undoing a fakeraid. http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/disabling-dmraid-fakeraid-on-cento…

16 years, 4 months

Re: [CentOS] How Can I ...

by fred roller

> I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router... Have you gone to the drive's web interface on your local net? (http://[ip of drive]) It has been my experience that these network storage devices typically come pre-configured for smb/sftp/(and one other i can't remember). The drive itself has a web interface in most cases allowing you to configure users and permissions. After you configure (if needed) a network discovery on the CentOS systems should show the NSD and allow a connection as you desire. Mine does a smb connection to my Windows system while I use sftp on all my Linux systems integrating file share seamlessly through the NSD. I don't care to put smb on my Linux machines as it seems to cause more trouble than it is worth; but, that is just a personal preference. My 2 bits, Fred

8 years

Re: [Centos] Upgrading from 3.4 to 4.0 beta X

by Johnny Hughes

On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 04:13 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Although upgrades are supported by the Red Hat Enterprise Linux family > on x86 processors, you are more likely to have a consistent experience > by backing up your data and then installing this release of Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 3.93 over your previous Red Hat Enterprise Linux > installation. Substitute CentOS-4Beta and CentOS-3.x and I agree with that statement. > However, before you chose to upgrade your system, there are a few things > you should keep in mind: > > * Individual package configuration files may or may not work after > performing an upgrade due to changes in various configuration > file formats or layouts. > > * If you have one of Red Hat's layered products (such as the > Cluster Suite) installed, it may need to be manually upgraded > after the Red Hat Enterprise Linux upgrade has been completed. > > * Third party or ISV applications may not work correctly following > the upgrade. I agree with that too ... it applies to CentOS upgrades to CentOS-4.0 > Caution > > As software evolves, configuration > file formats can change. It is very > important to carefully compare your > original configuration files to the > new files before integrating your > changes. > > Note > > It is always a good idea to back up > any data that you have on your > systems. For example, if you are > upgrading or creating a dual-boot > system, you should back up any data > you wish to keep on your hard drive > (s). Mistakes do happen and can > result in the loss of all of your > data. > > If you still choose to perform a traditional upgrade, type the following > command at the installation boot prompt: > > linux upgradeany I, like redhat, also think that backing up your data and doing a reinstall and then moving your data over is the best and most reliable solution. -- Johnny Hughes <http://www.HughesJR.com/>

21 years, 2 months

[CentOS] Cannot find Tcl library(Sort of OT)

by Mark LaPierre

Hey All, I'm trying to build Tux Racer. I get: checking for tcl8.5 library... no checking for tcl83 library... no checking for tcl8.2 library... no checking for tcl82 library... no checking for tcl8.0 library... no checking for tcl80 library... no checking for tcl library... no configure: error: Cannot find Tcl library The install manual says I may have to pass some options to configure: Many people will be able to run configure without passing any options. The more commonly-used configure options are: --with-tcl-libs=DIR: Specify Tcl library location --with-tcl-inc=DIR: Specify Tcl header file location --with-tcl-lib-name=NAME: Specify Tcl library base name I have: [mlapier@mushroom ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i tcl tclx-devel-8.4.0-15.el6.i686 tclx-8.4.0-15.el6.i686 tcl-brlapi-0.5.4-6.el6.i686 tcl-8.5.7-6.el6.i686 tcl-devel-8.5.7-6.el6.i686 tcl-pgtcl-1.6.2-3.el6.i686 [mlapier@mushroom ~]$ The problem I seem to have is that I don't know what to use to replace DIR: or NAME: to make it happy. Anyone know how to find the Tcl library location, Tcl header file location, and Tcl library base name? CentOS release 6.3 (Final) Linux mushroom.patch 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.i686 #1 SMP Wed Dec 19 04:30:58 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****

13 years, 2 months

[CentOS] Samba Setup Fails or Samba Access Fails

by Ken Plumley

I recently installed centos 4.1 and I'm trying to get samba working on it to serve windows boxes on a lan. I configured samba on the centos server using the graphical samba server configuration tool, which is similar to the samba setup on redhat 9 that I have successfully setup in the past. I setup samba user names and passwords with the same user names and passwords used on the win boxes. I'm not able to access any shared samba folders from win boxes on the lan. I disabled the firewall on the centos server using the graphical security level configuration tool but I still can't access the samba shares. When I use a win box to connect to samba it will not complete the connection. It acts like the firewall is still running. I disabled iptables on the centos server using the graphical services configuration tool but I still can't access the samba shares. I can ping the centos server from linux and windows boxes on the lan. The centos server can ping other machines on the lan and can access the internet. When I try to telnet into the centos server from win and linux boxes on the lan I get these messages: On linux boxes: "Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused" On win boxes: Connecting To 192.168.1.2...Could not open connection to the host, on port 23. No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. Can anyone tell me what Im doing wrong or what I need to do to get samba working on centos? Thanks in advance, Ken --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

20 years, 5 months

[CentOS] Updating kernel and RAID

by Fajar Priyanto

Hi all, Is there any pitfall when updating kernel with a software RAID-1 configuration? Thanks. -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 23:01:19 up 8:24, 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org

20 years

[CentOS] dhcpd.conf for balance-rr bonding

by Nurdiyana Ali

Hi, I am trying to configure linux bonding using balance-rr configuration. I could not find a way to configure dhcpd.conf for this purpose and failed miserably when I tried the following (dhcpd just failed): host servername { hardware ethernet [mac address interface #1] ; hardware ethernet [mac address interface #2] ; fixed-address 10.0.10.6; } In my understanding balance-rr would be issued a single IP address but using 2 mac addresses in round-robin mechanism. If this is true, how do I configure DHCPD to issue single IP address to 2 different MAC? Sincerely, Nurdiyana Ali.

7 years, 9 months

Search results for query "Linux ./configure"