On 08/08/2014 01:33 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 08/08/2014 01:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> as a show of hands, can we get a list of : >> 1) boards we have at the moment > > I'm going to hazard a guess there isn't any point in even mentioning > anything that isn't at least ARMv7? well, if people want to come along and do the work for other platforms, I dont see why we should block that. But realistically, I've been working on the assumption that 512MB of ram and 400Mhz+ is perhaps the lowest end we should try and target resource wise. > >> 2) Boards we would like to have in say the next 6 to 8 months >> >> 3) boards that dont make either of those two lists, but what folks think >> might be worth targetting anyway > > Am I right in assuming the main purpose of this question is for > determining which kernel builds are worth trying to provide? At the moment, I am trying to workout what sort of resources we might want to pool in for the builder, testing side. -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc